Raven EMS Education Program Manual
Instructor and Course Evaluation by Students Form

Instructor and course evaluations are sent to students after the completion of each course. Please take a few moments to evaluate this course and the presenters. Thank you.

Results of this evaluation, including the comments, will be available to instructors and faculty. The identity of the student submitting this evaluation will not be available to instructors.

Activity End Date and Name:

Class Evaluation Strongly Agree Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly Disagree
C1. Overall: This activity was a good class.
C2. This course increased my confidence to respond to a medical emergency.
C3. This activity presented content relevant to my practice (Question required by CAPCE).
C4. Course objectives were consistent with the course as advertised.
C5. This activity addressed each learning objective (Question required by CAPCE).
C6. This activity was well-organized and moved logically from one point to the next (Question required by CAPCE).
C7. This activity was supported appropriately by examples, graphs, tables, photos, and documented references that added to my comprehension and understanding (Question required by CAPCE).
C8. The visual design of presentation materials enhanced the learning process (Question required by CAPCE).
C9. The presentation materials were free of typos, spelling errors, and grammar errors (Question required by CAPCE).
C10. Course material was up-to-date, well-organized, and presented in sufficient depth.
C11. Handout materials enhanced course content.
Please provide your anonymous comments about the class here:

Instructor Evaluation Consider ALL faculty, staff, and instructors for this activity when answering the following questions Strongly Agree Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly Disagree
I1. Overall: The instructors were good instructors.
I2. Course administration was efficient and friendly.
I3. The instructors demonstrated a comprehensive knowledge of the subject.
I4. The instructors appeared to be interested and enthusiastic about the subject.
I5. The instructors encouraged questions and participation.
I6. The presenters spoke clearly and in a way that was interesting (Question required by CAPCE).
I7. This activity did not promote a product or exhibit a commercial bias (Question required by CAPCE).
Please provide your anonymous comments about the instructor here:
Facility Evaluation Consider ALL facilities used during this activity when answering the following questions Strongly Agree Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly Disagree
F1. Overall: This facility was a good facility.
F2. Meeting site was adequate in size, comfortable, and convenient.
Please provide your anonymous comments about the facility here:
Other topics and/or speakers you would like offered:

Change Log (3.85.250.ICES)

DateAuthorDescription of ChangeCitations
2023-12-13Becker, T.Theron Jack BeckerCreated this form.
2024-12-10Becker, T.Theron Jack BeckerAdded required questions to evaluation form from CAPCE(CAPCE, 2023)CAPCE. (2023). Accreditation manual. Commission on Accreditation for Prehospital Continuing Education.
2025-01-02Becker, T.Theron Jack BeckerMoved online from Adobe InDesign document.
2025-03-13Becker, T.Theron Jack BeckerAdded questions asked on military course evaluation forms.(Raven, 2025)Raven (2025, February 28). Raven Med A2C2 Course Evaluation . Raven Advisory.



Relevant. Resolute. Ready.
Raven EMS Education Manual - Table of Contents
BeckerTeam (main page)